Breaking the Plateau: A Data-Driven Approach to Running
- Sheetal Patil
- Apr 4
- 8 min read
Updated: Apr 8
By Alex, CTO and Co-founder of Netrin
In my previous post, I shared my 8-year running journey and the frustrating 4-year plateau I couldn't seem to break through. I described how despite consistent effort, my 10K time improved by only 1 second over four long years. Today, I want to dive into the science and methodology that finally broke that plateau.
When I started structured training, my coach evaluated my running data and delivered a simple verdict: I needed to stop following my “intuition” and follow a structured training plan based on exercise science. For natural runners, intuition guides them well into doing the right thing, but for someone who has struggled with running like me, following science would yield much better results.
The insights in this post aren't revolutionary in scientific/running circles – exercise physiologists have understood these principles for decades. But like many recreational runners, I had been stuck in what coaches call the "moderate intensity trap" – training too intensely to condition my heart but not hard enough to maximize my speed improvements
Let me break down the science behind this approach that transformed my running and eventually became central to Netrin's training philosophy.
Understanding Heart Rate Zones
While I'd been collecting heart rate data for nearly 7 years at this point, I hadn't understood how to use it effectively. Here's what I learned about the crucial zones that dictate training effects:
Zone 1 (50-60% max HR): Recovery – extremely easy effort that promotes blood flow and active recovery
Zone 2 (60-70% max HR): Aerobic base building – the foundation of endurance and efficiency
Zone 3 (70-80% max HR): Aerobic power – developing sustainable power output
Zone 4 (80-90% max HR): Lactate threshold – improving the body's ability to clear lactate/hydrogen ion accumulation which causes muscle fatigue
Zone 5 (90-100% max HR): Anaerobic capacity – short bursts that maximize power.
Note: We have an entire post which goes in detail about Zone training if you are interested
Looking back at my heart rate data from 2016-2022, I realized nearly all my runs were in Zone 4 – the lactate threshold zone. I was consistently training in the "neither here, nor there" between proper aerobic development (Zone 2) and high-intensity intervals (Zone 5).
This approach meant I was consistently:
Too fatigued to train truly hard when needed
Not accumulating enough low exertion periods required for aerobic development
Requiring excessive recovery between sessions
Creating a chronic state of partial fatigue
Building the Aerobic Engine through Zone 2
When our head coach Rahul first created a 16-week training plan for me, I was shocked to see that the first 14 weeks consisted almost entirely of Zone 2 runs. "That's it?" I asked him. "Just... slow running? For over three months?" He nodded, completely unfazed by my skepticism.
The biggest change (and challenge) in my training was dedicating about 80% of my running to Zone 2 – what initially felt like an embarrassingly slow pace.
Those first few months were, frankly, boring as hell. I'd been used to the adrenaline rush of pushing hard, the satisfaction of gasping for breath at the end of a run. Instead, I was jogging at what felt like a snail's pace. At least I wasn't constantly checking my phone – my Netrin Enhance app would dutifully tell me when I was going above my target heart rate. Although this made life easier, it didn't make it any less embarrassing when other runners zoomed past me. I worried I was losing fitness rather than gaining it.
Initially, my pace for my usual distances dropped quite significantly, which was disheartening.
As you can see from the graph, my average pace for my staple distance (5k) dropped initially once I started this training. I went from comfortably running 5K at around 6:30/km to barely maintaining 8:30/km while staying in Zone 2. It felt like moving backward.
But I stuck with it, and around week 10, something interesting started happening. Distances that had previously left me winded were becoming comfortable, and my pace was gradually increasing while my heart rate stayed the same. The science was working, even if it wasn't providing the immediate gratification of a hard workout.
My friend Kathit has written an entire post on just Zone 2 training - do check it out!
It took me nearly 8 months to "unlearn" my bad habits, but once I was past the hump, my pace not only recovered but improved significantly beyond my previous capabilities. This is cardiovascular efficiency in action – a temporary step back that enables a much larger leap forward.
The Magic of Recovery
One of the most important realizations was understanding that improvement doesn't happen during training – it happens during recovery. When you train, you create stress on your body. It's during the recovery period that your body adapts and gets stronger.
Before 2022, my approach left little room for proper recovery:
Hard runs at every outing (usually every other day) meant I was often starting workouts in a partially recovered state
Constant muscle soreness limited how frequently I could run, consecutive days of run were very rare
Insufficient recovery time prevented proper physiological adaptations
By implementing proper Zone 2 training (which is less taxing on the body) for most runs, I created space for both:
More effective recovery between sessions
Higher quality during hard workouts when I did push the intensity
This approach allowed for consistent training without overtraining, which led to steady improvement rather than plateaus or regressions.
Intervals: Quality Over Quantity
While slow Zone 2 runs formed the foundation of my training, intervals are the weapons for performance breakthroughs. Unlike the "run hard every time" approach of my past, these were strategic, targeted sessions. There are several interval patterns – from short sprints that improved my running form, to zone-alternating sessions that built both aerobic and anaerobic capacity, to progressive efforts that taught my body to handle increasing intensity.
Intervals complemented my Zone 2 base training, rather than detracting from it. Together, they created a complete training stimulus that steady-state running alone never provided.
The challenge with interval training is execution. It's remarkably difficult to do intervals correctly without proper guidance:
Heart rate must vary rapidly: Moving between different zones quickly requires precise timing and effort management
Accurate data is essential: Standard PPG sensors (the green light on most watches) struggle with rapid heart rate changes, often lagging or missing peaks entirely
Guidance matters: Without real-time feedback, it's easy to push too hard or not hard enough
We built the Netrin app to help execute these complex workouts correctly – hitting the right intensities at the right times without guesswork or the mental math I would have needed on my own. The voice guidance carried me through each interval session, telling me exactly when to push and when to recover based on my actual heart response, not to mention the fact that a smartwatch's divination on my heart rate is based on low quality, high motion data.
Intervals provide unique benefits that steady-state running alone can't deliver. They boost VO2 max through short, intense efforts that push cardiovascular system to its limits, improve lactate threshold by teaching body to clear lactate more efficiently, enhance running economy by refining form and efficiency across all speeds, and most importantly build mental toughness to handle controlled doses of discomfort.
This combination of physiological and psychological adaptations became crucial to my overall development as a runner.
The Data Accuracy Question
A brief but important aside on heart rate monitoring: the accuracy of your data matters significantly, especially when the heart rate has quick variations. Most consumer wearables use PPG (photoplethysmography) – the green light sensors on the back of watches – which can be reasonably accurate during steady-state exercise but often struggles during high-intensity intervals.
At Netrin, we use ECG (electrocardiography) technology, which measures the electrical signals from your heart directly. The difference is particularly noticeable during interval training, where PPG sensors often lag or provide inaccurate readings during rapid heart rate changes.
Why is PPG not as accurate as ECG? This deserves its own dedicated post (coming soon), but it's worth mentioning that accurate heart rate data is fundamental to zone-based training. Training in the wrong zones due to inaccurate data can significantly impact your results.
The Art of Periodization
Another critical element that transformed my approach was understanding periodization – the structured variation in training over time. Most recreational runners (including my former self) follow the same pattern week after week, leading to stagnation.
Effective training requires variation at multiple levels:
Microcycles: Weekly patterns that balance intensity, volume, and recovery
Mesocycles: 4-6 week blocks focused on specific fitness components
Macrocycles: Larger seasonal or annual plans building toward peak performances
Strategic deloading: Planned reduction in training load to allow for complete recovery
Netrin's coaching approach implements this periodized structure automatically, ensuring that training evolves as your fitness improves. I've found that these strategic variations – particularly the counterintuitive deload weeks where training volume temporarily decreases – have been crucial for long-term progress.
Without periodization, training becomes monotonous both physically and mentally. Your body adapts to the same stimulus and plateaus, while your mind grows bored with the repetition. With properly structured variation, each phase builds upon the previous one, creating a sustainable path to continuous improvement.
The Strength Component
While my primary focus was on running, I also incorporated simple strength and conditioning work that made a noticeable difference in my performance:
Bodyweight exercises 2-3 times per week (squats, lunges, push-ups, planks)
Regular mobility work to maintain joint health
Core strengthening to improve running form
What I discovered was that you don't need expensive gym equipment or complicated routines – bodyweight exercises are sufficient for most runners, especially when starting out. Even 15-20 minutes of strength work a few times a week can make a significant difference in running economy and resilience.
That said, you do eventually outgrow bodyweight training. After about two years of consistent bodyweight routines, I reached a point where I needed more resistance to continue making strength gains. At that stage, I did find a qualified personal trainer (who eventually became a Netrin coach himself!) who could ensure proper form with weighted exercises. The transition from bodyweight to weighted training required careful guidance to avoid injury and maximize benefits.
Putting It All Together
What made all this effective wasn't any single element, but rather how they all worked together as a comprehensive system:
Zone 2 training built the aerobic foundation
Strategic intervals provided targeted high-intensity stimulus
Proper recovery allowed adaptations to occur
Periodization prevented plateaus and staleness
Complementary strength work improved economy and prevented injuries
Every component played a crucial role in breaking through my plateau, and removing any single element would have compromised the results.
Comments